Curing India of Capitalitis: A Call for Conviviality
In a thought-provoking article, the writer delves into the concept of 'capitalitis' and its detrimental impact on India's social and administrative fabric. The term, coined by public health expert John Oommen, refers to the tendency of those in power, particularly in Delhi, to impose policies and decisions that are not universally applicable or representative of the diverse needs of the country.
The author begins by highlighting the symptoms of capitalitis, using the example of the On-Screen Marking (OSM) system introduced by the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). The OSM, despite being suggested by its advisory committee, was implemented with limited pilot projects, primarily involving teachers from Delhi-based schools. This approach, the writer argues, fails to consider the unique challenges faced by educators in regions far from the capital, such as erratic power supplies and intermittent internet access.
The piece then takes a trip down memory lane, recalling a committee experience where academics from across India worked collaboratively to design a national-level graduate examination. The author reminisces about the convivial atmosphere, collegiality, and joy that characterized their efforts. This contrasts sharply with the current scenario, where the National Testing Agency (NTA) has taken over exam administration, facing criticism for its structure and staffing, which prioritize efficiency over the passionate involvement of individuals.
The writer further explores the combination of capitalitis and AI, questioning whether an AI-driven system could be both efficient and convivial. The potential for AI to generate questions, provide answers, and administer evaluations raises concerns about the loss of human creativity and out-of-the-box thinking. The author emphasizes the importance of a convivial society, where diversity is celebrated, and efficiency is not the sole metric for success.
In conclusion, the article calls for a cure of capitalitis, urging readers to recognize and address this pervasive issue. The writer emphasizes the need for a more inclusive and representative approach to policy-making and administration, one that values conviviality and the diverse needs of India's regions. The author's personal perspective highlights the importance of a federal system that fosters collaboration, sociability, and a shared sense of purpose.
This piece serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the challenges India faces in achieving a convivial and inclusive society, offering a critical perspective on the role of central authority and the need for a more balanced approach to governance.
